• Randy Picker – An Inspiration

    Posted by

    Randy Picker died on August 15, 2026. Randy will forever be a University of Chicago legend, a three-time alum, beloved professor, and, this summer, named to one of the most challenging roles a modern university offers: Vice Provost for Academic Affairs. Randy has been an academic superstar in multiple doctrinal fields, including competition policy/antitrust and intellectual property, as well as in methodologies such as game theory. This Credit Slips tribute emphasizes his contributions to the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law.

    I met Randy in the 1990s as Congress expanded and intensified its aspirations for bankruptcy reform, and got to watch him testify before Congress several times on behalf of the National Bankruptcy Conference. Randy had been the reporter for the National Bankruptcy Conference’s exhaustive review of the Bankruptcy Code published in 1994 and again in 1997 – a monumental undertaking on many metrics, and one that has influenced policy discussions in the intervening decades. By the time I met him, Randy was well-recognized for his bankruptcy scholarship, including co-authoring one of the best known articles on municipal bankruptcy. At a March 1999 House Judiciary Committee hearing, he was given a tough assignment: to explain why a securitization provision in the bill, touted as a no-brainer by its advocates, was problematic. Here is an excerpt of his testimony at the March 1999 hearing:

    The problem is that with regard to securitizations, understanding when you have a true sale and when you don’t turns out to be really hard…. The statute has taken what I would regard as what I think of as a deemed-tiger approach to solving this problem, and what I mean by that is as follows: I think of my 5-year-old son, Adam, walking into the room with his pink stuffed elephant and saying, here’s my tiger. I assume that would get some quizzical looks, right? We’d all look at Adam and say, you know, that’s an elephant, not a tiger. He would say, no, I’ve deemed it to be a tiger, and because I’ve deemed it to be a tiger, it’s therefore a tiger. Well, that’s exactly what this legislation does. If you look at the approach to a definition of transfer on page 286 of H.R. 833, and in particular line 10, a debtor who represents and warrants that a sale is a sale makes it a sale. All you have to do is say it’s a sale. You represent and warrant it’s a sale and you’re done. Well we have never in the history of commercial transactions law relied on the characterization of the parties to the transaction to determine what that transaction is, when it will have third party consequences. Do understand that asset securitization will have third party consequences.

    (Find his full verbal and written testimony starting on page 355).

    Even as other fields and projects consumed more of his time and attention, Randy continued service to the field of bankruptcy, including recently as Vice-Chair of the National Bankruptcy Conference.

    Randy’s commitment to and appreciation of state commercial law also has a long pedigree.  He served as a Uniform Law Commissioner (then called the National Conference of Uniform Law Commissioners, or NCCUSL) at a pivotal time, when Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code was being significantly overhauled. He wrote pathbreaking scholarship about secured credit that should inspire more such work now. Throughout his academic career, Randy continued to teach secured transactions with enthusiasm and rave reviews, to the benefit of students and the legal profession.

    Speaking of courses, Randy lived the truth that passion about teaching and scholarly inquiry are mutually reinforcing rather than in opposition. Indeed, Randy was a pedagogical trailblazer. Did I even know what a MOOC was before overhearing Randy mention starting one? When COVID shutdown necessitated remote learning, he created more opportunities for learning and engagement, including taking Zoom’s potential to whole other levels with a remarkable summer seminar for alumni. And he contributed to the education of business school students as well as his law school teaching.

    One last point: Randy was generous with people with no connection with the University of Chicago, with no particular aptitude for game theory or computer simulations (or improv, for that matter). I am such a person. Both early in my career and later, I sought his counsel on academic and professional things. He made time for me and was always constructive. That invisible professional service – whether it reflects kindness or social welfare maximization – is worth discussing out loud, and paying forward.

    Deepest condolences to Randy Picker’s family. He will remain an inspiration.

     

     

     


    in

  • A Light Tap on the Wrist for AI Use Misuse?

    Posted by

    Late last week, the Seventh Circuit held that a private property tax purchaser holds a secured claim that qualifies as a tax claim under § 511(a). It thus also held that if this secured claim is to be paid during a chapter 13 plan, § 511(a) provides that “applicable nonbankruptcy law” supplies the interest rate. Bernardo Romero v. Corona Investments, LLC, 25-02021 (7th Cir. July 16, 2026). This holding is not what is most remarkable about this case, even though there was a dissent contesting the characterization of a private purchaser as holding a claim under § 511(a) and thus the application of an interest rate other than Till.

    The more remarkable aspect of the case and opinion is that the attorney for the tax purchaser apparently used AI to draft its brief, which resulted in the inclusion of AI hallucinated quotes. The debtor’s attorney brought this to the court’s attention with a motion to strike portions of the brief. The attorney, being candid, noted that the AI hallucinations did not materially affect the presentation of the appeal. So the majority opinion ends by merely “lodg[ing] a general reminder that the court expects members of our bar to exercise care and diligence in preparing their briefs to ensure complete factual and legal accuracy.” The dissent possibly wanted to go further. It highlights that the tax purchaser’s brief “included an astonishing number of erroneous and even hallucinated citations,” but ultimately merely notes that the hallucinations “made this court’s work more difficult than it should have been. We should expect and insist on better, more professional performance.”

    Sure, sanctions have been imposed in other recent cases with hallucinated citations (including in the Seventh Circuit) and could have been appropriate here. Instead, what this law firm received was the lightest tap on the wrist by being named, both the individual attorney and the firm, in the dissent only. One firm uses AI seemingly without checking the results (which I’m confident in writing is a professionally irresponsibly use of AI) and the other not only catches it, but also professionally appropriately brings it to the court’s attention, including sketching out the scope of the problems introduced by opposing counsel’s irresponsible use of AI. I’m gearing up to teach contracts this fall. And I’m incorporating more discussion of the use (and misuse) of GenAI tools than I ever have before. What does this teach students (and attorneys) about the ramifications of over-dependence on AI?


    in

    ,

  • The New Yorker and the Uniform Commercial Code – Together at Last?

    Posted by

    Did explaining the Uniform Commercial Code to your literary loved ones just get a shortcut? Behold the three paragraphs (generously counting) in The New Yorker about this unusual but powerful legal product. The print edition date: June 29, 2026. The article: Hot Pursuit: The repo man coming for your ride, by Paige Williams. In the print version, the article starts on page 28 and one must buckle up and hold on tight through page 33 to evaluate those three paragraphs (generously counting) for yourself.


  • New Swiss Personal Insolvency Law At Last!

    Posted by

    Today, both houses of the Swiss Parliament finally adopted an agreed version of a long-debated law to bring personal insolvency in Switzerland into line with international norms. The new law is one of the last in Europe that finally offers a meaningful discharge to hopelessly overindebted individuals, consumers and entrepreneurs alike. On the long, tortured history of this topic in Switzerland, see here.


    in

  • OCC Interchange Preemption Rule

    Posted by

    I submitted a comment letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regarding its proposed rule on interchange fees as non-interest fees and charges and its preemption order thereunder regarding the Illinois Interchange Prohibition Act.

    My comment letter does not address the policy wisdom of the Illinois law. Rather, it focuses on the legal infirmities of the OCC rule. If we take the Major Questions Doctrine and the Unitary Executive Theory seriously, it is hard to see the authority for the OCC rule for national banks. (Yes, laugh away—we all know that these doctrines only apply in one direction, but let’s at least call out the hypocrisy.)

    For Federal savings associations, the authority is even thinner; the OCC claims in a footnote that they have comparable powers, but the sole authority it cites subjects the Federal savings associations’ power to transfer funds to “applicable law,” which would be both the Illinois statute and federal antitrust laws, such that Federal savings associations cannot receive interchange fees that violate either the Illinois statute or federal antitrust laws.


    in

  • Would Anti-Weaponization Fund Payments Be False Claims Act Violations?

    Posted by

    I might be straying a bit from our usual debtor-creditor fare with this post, but I hope you’ll indulge me–there is a small bankruptcy hook. The President’s newly created $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund has been the subject of substantial political uproar. It’s not clear, however, that Congress is going to do anything to prohibit or limit the fund.  Yet there might already be an existing legal tool that would make it very risky for anyone to accept a payment from the fund: the federal False Claims Act.

    (more…)


    in

  • It’s All Debt to Me

    Posted by

    It’s All Debt to Me, by Professor Kate Elengold, is a newly available article sure to be of interest to many Credit Slips readers. Check out the abstract and read the paper by clicking on this link, but in the meantime, an observation from the article’s conclusion, coupled with the article’s graphic of a set of triangles, frames what to expect:

    This Article has identified, explained, and explored the way that varied laws and doctrine come together to create the “law of individual debt.” In so doing, it has offered both scaffolding and mapping to understand, holistically, how the law treats debtors and creditors across two axes: public/private and voluntary/involuntary. It asks and answers the question: why are four-similarly situated debtors, each carrying $15,000 of debt that they cannot repay, treated so differently under the law?


  • Joe Smith’s Life in Banking

    Posted by

    Joe Smith has been (among other things!) the general counsel of a regional bank, Commissioner of Banks for North Carolina; and the official independent settlement monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement.  And Joe has some reflections on these experiences that I recommend reading. One easy way to get started is with his 2026 essay published by The North Carolina Banking Institute.


  • Eddie Bauer’s New Jersey Venue

    Posted by

    Multi-Color Corporation is not the only pending New Jersey bankruptcy case with something strange going on in the venue department. Eddie Bauer’s venue is very odd too. (more…)


    in

  • Multi-Color Corporation: Venue Responses

    Posted by

    My amicus brief in the Multi-Color Corporation bankruptcy seems to have touched a nerve, with some interesting responses from both the debtor and Judge Kaplan. I’ll note that this is not the first time something has seemed amiss with New Jersey venue, and it’s not even the only pending case with strange venue.  

    I want to respond to the debtor’s claims about case distribution, to Judge Kaplan’s comments. In a separate post I’m going to discuss venue in the Eddie Bauer’s bankruptcy (which is with Judge Meisel). 

    (more…)


    in

    ,

Search Credit Slips

About Us & Policies